The title bothers me. It suggests to me that "AI" is a single thing. If two guys are tested and turn out to be not that great at reading MRI images, should the headline be "Male radiologists miss nearly one-third of breast cancers"?
If it said "AI something", I'd be fine with it. It's a statement about that something, not about AI in general. Use it as an adjective (short for "AI-using" I guess?), not a noun.
There are more radiologists than AI models that read MRIs.
> It suggests to me that "AI" is a single thing.
But it is. It's LLMs. There is no other "AI".
Haven't you read HN in the past 1-2 years?
They will directly write that "Radiologists miss nearly one-third of breast cancers."
I trust the meaning of this article is just that it requires hospitals to rethink their decision to substitute all doctors today.