logoalt Hacker News

bigstrat2003today at 5:29 PM4 repliesview on HN

The push for shorter and shorter cert lifetimes is a really poor idea, and indicates that the people working on these initiatives have no idea how things are done in the wider world.


Replies

alibarbertoday at 5:55 PM

Well they offer a money-back guarantee. And other providers of SSL certificates exist.

show 1 reply
jofla_nettoday at 6:33 PM

Rule by the few, us little people don't matter.

Thing is, NOTHING, is stopping anyone from already getting short lived certs and being 'proactive' and rotating through. What it is saying is, well, we own the process so we'll make Chrome not play ball with your site anymore unless you do as we say...

The CA system has cracks, that short lived certs don't fix, so meanwhile we'll make everyone as uncomfortable as possible while we rearrange deck chairs.

awaiting downvotes in earnest.

jdsullytoday at 6:29 PM

At some point it makes sense to just let us use self signed certs. Nobody believes SSL is providing attestation anyways.

show 3 replies
Sohcahtoa82today at 5:46 PM

It's really security theater, too.

Though if I may put on my tinfoil hat for a moment, I wonder if current algorithms for certificate signing have been broken by some government agency or hacker group and now they're able to generate valid certificates.

But I guess if that were true, then shorter cert lives wouldn't save you.

show 4 replies