logoalt Hacker News

430k-year-old well-preserved wooden tools are the oldest ever found

268 pointsby bookofjoetoday at 3:46 PM146 commentsview on HN

https://archive.ph/mHlUT

https://apnews.com/article/oldest-wooden-tools-marathousa-1-...

https://archaeologymag.com/2026/01/430000-year-old-wooden-to...


Comments

drakythetoday at 4:12 PM

430,000 years? Am I reading this headline correctly? (since the site seems to have fallen victim to the HN-hug-of-death). That seems wildly further back than I understood humans to have tools, or even homo sapiens to have existed.

ETA: Today I learned I had a much much larger gap in knowledge than I thought I did. Thanks to everyone for the information and links!

show 9 replies
alsetmusictoday at 4:34 PM

There's bound to be a lot of vital archeological evidence of the development of humans and our cousins below the water. Past peoples probably lived near the coasts and the rising water would have obscured or destroyed a lot of the evidence of their existence. I think a lot about what must be or have been just out of reach of our current studies.

show 1 reply
emeriltoday at 9:06 PM

maybe the trump administration can learn something from these tools to offset the 10k STEM PhDs that have resigned and moved onto to greener pastures...

shay_kertoday at 7:43 PM

The thing I’m continually surprised by is the usage of obsidian by nearly every ancient-ish civilization. The usage of bow & arrow predates farming, insane.

joe8756438today at 7:43 PM

Estimates will continue to go earlier, and more things that were, or are, alive will be considered exceptional. Seems to be a function of looking.

lugutoday at 7:46 PM

> The finding, along with the discovery of a 500,000-year-old hammer made of bone, indicates that our human ancestors were making tools even earlier than archaeologists *thought*.

I am tired of this. No. Archeologist only claim what they have discovered. They don't speculate because they work based on evidences. Journalists should better. This wording sounds like archeologists were wrong. That only fuel the narrative that layman's opinion is more informed than professionals.

notorandittoday at 6:39 PM

I wonder how would we react with tools dating back to, say, 5MY ago ...

That would shake our knowledge from the foundations.

show 3 replies
melenaboijatoday at 7:16 PM

Ok, since I moved to the US from Europe a few years ago my perception of wood has changed a lot, especially for construction. Seeing this reinforces my view.

Wood lasts for fucking ever under the proper conditions. Old construction in Europe often only had the beams made of wood, and I always thought that was orders of magnitude more durable than wooden houses, like thousands of years vs decades. I don’t think that’s true anymore.

And this might be one of the few environmentally friendly decisions that Americans got better than Europeans, I guess. Wood is still prevalent in construction here, and as far as I know concrete and cement production are quite bad.

BTW, I’m a total ignorant about all this so just intuition and probably wrong

show 2 replies
guywithahattoday at 8:15 PM

What's incredible about this too is they found it in England, which means they had to first build a boat to get there and leave the tools on the island

show 1 reply
tikutoday at 7:44 PM

Now find the tools used by the Egyptians or the people before that lived there and made the tool markings..

maximgeorgetoday at 8:16 PM

[dead]

dangtoday at 6:17 PM

[stub for offtopicness]

show 4 replies
HocusLocustoday at 5:03 PM

I have always believed that the human evolution consensus which is usually based upon finds of advanced toolmaking in absence of culture cues, to be questionable by orders of magnitude. So it seemed natural to simply double generational concepts of the village along a trade route, from ~500kya (like the Nile) to 1 million YA as a hyperstable span of evolution of the 'trade route village'. I even wrote a book about it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtxgpaXp9vA that might seem like whole fiction. But science seems not to ask, how many times might we have started over?

show 1 reply
khalictoday at 6:28 PM

I can’t be the only one that saw the aforementioned tools and thought: did I misread stool?

show 1 reply
an0maloustoday at 4:25 PM

There is archaeological evidence of tools going back even further, potentially over a million years, but it's ignored for the usual reasons of dogma and not conveniently fitting into the paradigm of the current priestly class. I'd highly recommend this talk Michael Cremo (author of "Forbidden Archaeology") gave for this "Authors at Google" program in 2014:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKfGC3P9KoQ

show 4 replies