logoalt Hacker News

cosmicgadgetyesterday at 3:38 PM8 repliesview on HN

> “We look forward to moving forward with those claims and note WhatsApp’s denials have all been carefully worded in a way that stops short of denying the central allegation in the complaint – that Meta has the ability to read WhatsApp messages, regardless of its claims about end-to-end encryption.”

My money is on the chats being end to end encrypted and separately uploaded to Facebook.


Replies

gruezyesterday at 4:23 PM

>being end to end encrypted and separately uploaded to Facebook

That's a cute loophole you thought up, but whatsapp's marketing is pretty unequivocal that they can't read your messages.

>With end-to-end encryption on WhatsApp, your personal messages and calls are secured with a lock. Only you and the person you're talking to can read or listen to them, and no one else, not even WhatsApp

https://www.whatsapp.com/

That's not to say it's impossible that they are secretly uploading your messages, but the implication that they could be secretly doing so while not running afoul of their own claims because of cute word games, is outright false.

show 8 replies
varencyesterday at 4:19 PM

If this was happening en-masse, wouldn't this be discovered by the many people reverse engineering WhatsApp? Reverse engineering is hard sophisticated work, but given how popular WhatsApp is plenty of independent security researchers are doing it. I'm quite skeptical Meta could hide some malicious code in WhatsApp that's breaking the E2EE without it being discovered.

show 4 replies
matthewdgreenyesterday at 4:28 PM

I really doubt this. Any such upload would be visible inside the WhatsApp application, which would make it the world's most exciting (and relatively straightforward) RE project. You can even start with a Java app, so it's extra easy.

show 1 reply
random3yesterday at 3:56 PM

That’s because they have such a good track record wrt to privacy? https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/California_Northern_Distri...

show 1 reply
steve_tayloryesterday at 4:34 PM

> My money is on the chats being end to end encrypted and separately uploaded to Facebook.

If governments of various countries have compelled Meta to provide a backdoor and also required non-disclosure (e.g. a TCN secretly issued to Meta under Australia's Assistance and Access Act), this is how I imagined they would do it. It technically doesn't break encryption as the receiving device receives the encrypted message.

guerrillayesterday at 4:19 PM

> My money is on the chats being end to end encrypted and separately uploaded to Facebook.

This is what I've suspected for a long time. I bet that's it. They can already read both ends, no need to b0rk the encryption. It's just them doing their job to protect you from fourth parties, not from themselves.

FabHKyesterday at 5:06 PM

It should be detectable if it sends twice the data.

show 1 reply
RajT88yesterday at 8:19 PM

Facebook messenger similarly claims to be end to end encrypted, and yet if it thinks you are sending a link to a pirate site, it "fails to send". I imagine there are a great many blacklisted sites which they shadow block, despite "not being able to read your messages".

My pet conspiracy theory is that the "backup code" which "restores" encrypted messages is there to annoy you into installing the app instead of chatting on the web.

show 1 reply