logoalt Hacker News

dgrin91today at 3:19 PM7 repliesview on HN

Do you really think a $30 hetzner host can sustain that level of traffic performantly? Don't get me wrong, I love hetzner, but I would be very surprised if the numbers work out there.


Replies

Nextgridtoday at 3:24 PM

Isn’t it just serving static content and the content fitting in RAM? If so your laptop can serve it just fine even.

show 1 reply
schnebbautoday at 3:29 PM

Lol yes? It's all reads. If it can all fit in ram, great. Otherwise an SSD will do fine too.

show 1 reply
thomasfromcdnjstoday at 3:36 PM

If it's mostly static, just cache it at the http level e.g. cloudflare which I believe wouldn't even charge for 450m requests on the $20 plan at least

blibbletoday at 3:21 PM

yes

and if it doesn't spawn up another $30 instance and add another RR entry to the dns

serving static content scales horizontally perfectly

gnfargbltoday at 3:45 PM

I would use a $100/mo box with a much better CPU and more RAM, but I think the pinch point might be the 1Gbps unmetered networking that Hetzner provide.

They will sell you a 10Gbps uplink however, with (very reasonably priced) metered bandwidth.

mdrzntoday at 3:22 PM

For sure, even cheaper if you cache effectively.

ExpertAdvisor01today at 3:31 PM

No . Hetzner would terminate your server as you are not a profitable customer.

show 3 replies