logoalt Hacker News

Amazon Ring's lost dog ad sparks backlash amid fears of mass surveillance

194 pointsby jedbergtoday at 6:43 PM95 commentsview on HN

Comments

mjr00today at 7:45 PM

The Dark Knight was released in 2008. In that movie, Batman hijacks citizens' cellphones to track down the Joker, and it's presented as a major moral and ethical dilemma as part of the movie's overall themes. The only way Batman remains a "good guy" in the eyes of the audience is by destroying the entire thing once he's done.

Crazy to think that less than two decades later, an even more powerful surveillance technology is being advertised at the Super Bowl as a great and wonderful thing and you should totally volunteer to upload your Ring footage so it can be analyzed for tracking down the Jok... I mean illegal imm... I mean lost pets.

show 8 replies
text0404today at 7:41 PM

Even more concerning is that Ring is partnering with Flock [1], which has been the subject of quite a bit of controversy recently [2][3][4], with the CEO lashing out at critics with inflammatory language [5][6].

[1] https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/flock-safety-and-ring-partn...

[2] https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/flock-roundup

[3] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/10/ice-school-c...

[4] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/effs-investigations-ex...

[5] https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/flock-ceo-goes-...

[6] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46903556

show 1 reply
davidwtoday at 7:17 PM

The WeRateDogs guy broke character and put out a video attacking that ad

https://bsky.app/profile/weratedogs.com/post/3mejrtyvkyc2o

show 2 replies
Animatstoday at 9:20 PM

They don't have a lost-kid feature?

In China, kids are accustomed to face recognition early.[1] The kids are checking into school via fare gates with face recognition. Here's an ad for Hikvision surveillance systems showing the whole system.[2] Hikvision has a whole series of videos presenting their concept of a kindly, gentler Big Brother. This is probably the most amusing.[3]

Amazon's concept is in some ways more powerful. They don't need full coverage. Just sparse, but widespread coverage. Anything that moves around will pass through the view of cameras at some point. Suspicious behavior can be detected in the back end cloud processing, which improves over time.

Flock has the same concept. Flock coverage is sparse in terms of area, but widespread.

"1984" was so last cen.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SMKG8aLTJ38

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnHFJz-u85A

[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otAuH6FDhgw

show 1 reply
pibakertoday at 9:14 PM

There would be less backlash to the Ring ad if the ad was honest about how people actually use it. Show us porch pirates, burglars and stupid neighbor who backs into your car being caught on camera.

But instead, they have to come up with something "wholesome" like finding your lost doggo. The wholesomeness is so forced and cringe that it makes you think they have something to hide. It almost feels like the people who wrote this ad and the people who greenlit it knew something was wrong so they have to come up with a cover story. But like a child smiling at you with his biggest smile while anxiously keeping his hands behind his back, it only makes them more suspicious especially in a time when big tech feels more and more like an adversary than a friend.

show 2 replies
foxfiredtoday at 9:10 PM

There’s no need to fear the construction of mass surveillance anymore. It’s already here. We built it one convenience at a time [0]. When I see all my friends with Alexa devices at home, ring cameras, and a million food apps on their phones, it feels like it’s already too late.

[0]: https://idiallo.com/blog/we-have-all-we-need-for-mass-survei...

jedbergtoday at 6:43 PM

Amazon also had the ad about Alexa killing you. Not sure what they were thinking exactly.

show 2 replies
gentleman11today at 7:16 PM

Fears of mass surveillance? It's already mass surveillance

show 1 reply
manicennuitoday at 9:27 PM

Did they not realize that it is already a mass surveillance network?

blibbletoday at 7:38 PM

that advert is just so horribly manipulative it's borderline evil

how can normal people go to work and produce this output?

(I suppose everyone that is prepared to work at Amazon corporate is... a certain type of person)

show 2 replies
dev_l1x_betoday at 9:17 PM

Are you a dog?? No?? So you do not have anything to worry about!!

So they say.

damnesiantoday at 9:08 PM

Know what is super easy to do? Not buy Amazon Ring products.

show 1 reply
an-allentoday at 9:14 PM

The fears of mass surveillance are some of the funniest things I can think of. Do you think a tree grows a leaf and then says I don’t care what you do leaf.

RcouF1uZ4gsCtoday at 9:21 PM

I think Nancy Guthrie and the release of the doorbell video by scouring Google’s caches has done far, far more to make people want video cameras and cloud storage than any ad.

gbolcertoday at 8:59 PM

Yeah in a world where if you post a Ring video of someone taking a crowbar to your mailbox which gets a strike in your neighborhood group and the video down for "hate", yeah, as useful as it is, the mass surveillance stuff is pretty alarming.

wolvoleotoday at 7:24 PM

https://archive.is/J7KGU

Archive link posted because in some cases (not all, strange enough) there's a paywall ("subscribe to continue reading")

russellbeattietoday at 9:27 PM

Amazon marketing broke a fundamental rule about consumer tech: Don't remind users about how much Big Tech knows about you.

Your various devices track everywhere you go, who you communicate with, what you search for, what you buy, what audio you listen to, what videos you watch, what games you play, who your family is, all your pictures and video you take, who comes and goes from your house, when you sleep, your health data, and much more.

And as a fundamental part of Big Tech's business they accumulate, aggregate and analyze all that information in various ways to increase profits. They don't keep this a secret, but wisely they normally don't brag about it to the general public.

Consumers have shown that are totally willing to give up privacy for convenience. Just don't remind them of it.

Archelaostoday at 7:21 PM

What exactly are the "neighborhood cameras" mentioned in the article?

show 1 reply
Gagarin1917today at 8:16 PM

Bullshit. The only people worried are the ones that were already concerned and never bought a Ring.

I guarantee the vast majority of people LOVE this new feature.

show 3 replies
nullbytetoday at 8:07 PM

I'm afraid that ship has sailed

show 1 reply
1970-01-01today at 7:14 PM

What backlash? "People voiced concerns" turns out to be 9 people if you follow the link. Where exactly is this backlash and why can't I smell it?

show 7 replies
crooked-vtoday at 7:35 PM

That ad gave me a visceral shudder of revulsion, not so much for the specific functionality on display as for the timing, which absolutely could not have been accidental. They might as well have just put 'and we're working on automatic alerts for ICE!' in the ad.

show 1 reply
josefritzisheretoday at 8:26 PM

Amazon has a very bad track record in this area. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/amazon-is-wagi...

show 1 reply
bradley13today at 8:46 PM

Recording public spaces should be illegal. Public street? Public sidewalk? Not your turf, no cameras, no recording.

show 3 replies