logoalt Hacker News

0x696C6961today at 6:49 AM5 repliesview on HN

Man... I spent the last 6 months writing code using voice chat with multiple concurrent Claude code agents using an orchestration system because I felt like that was the new required skill set.

In the past few weeks I've started opening neovim again and just writing code. It's still 50/50 with a Claude code instance, but fuck I don't feel a big productivity difference.


Replies

gzreadtoday at 12:08 PM

Right. If AI actually made you more productive, there would be more good software around, and we wouldn't have the METR study showing it makes you 20% slower.

AI delivers the feeling of productivity and the ability to make endless PoCs. For some tasks it's actually good, of course, but writing high quality software by itself isn't one.

show 1 reply
cwbriscoetoday at 6:57 AM

I just write my own code and then ask AI to find any issues and correct them if I feel it is good advice. What AI is amazing at is writing most of my test cases. Saves me a lot of time.

show 2 replies
tossandthrowtoday at 8:52 AM

There has always been a difference on modality and substance.

This is the same thing as picking a new smart programming language or package, or insisting that Dvorak layout is the only real way forward.

Personally I try to put as much distance to the modality discussion and get intimate with the substance.

p0w3n3dtoday at 9:09 AM

> voice chat ... required skill set

But we're still required to go to the office, and talking to a computer on the open space is highly unwelcome

stavrostoday at 9:23 AM

Really? The past two weeks I've been writing code with AI and feel a massive productivity difference, I ended up with 22k loc, which is probably around as many I'd have manually written for the featureset at hand, except it would have taken me months.

show 1 reply