logoalt Hacker News

rcontitoday at 8:39 PM3 repliesview on HN

Yeah, this jumped out at me too. It's a wild misunderstanding of how BBSes worked.

That said, I have no idea how a multi-node BBS would work, in terms of keeping state synchronized.


Replies

xenadu02today at 9:05 PM

> It's a wild misunderstanding of how BBSes worked.

That's quite the assumption.

There were a lot of different BBS hosting programs. They wildly varied in what they supported and how they were implemented. Further even within a given piece of software the ways you could configure them and the consequences also varied. Even if a given software supported concurrent users on a single PC for various reasons a BBS might choose not to host that way.

icedchaitoday at 8:46 PM

It depends on the era.

Earlier: one PC per user, shared file system using a Novell network. Later: multitasking OS (Desqview, OS/2) or BBS software that natively supported multiple users (like MajorBBS.)

I ran a BBS on an Amiga for a while. The OS natively supported multitasking, but I only had one line. At least I could log in the same time as a user...

show 1 reply
jacquesmtoday at 8:49 PM

I've seen NetWare, Vines, some proprietary hacks to form the backbone.