alt Hacker News> Retain full human responsibility and accountability for any consequences arising from the use of AI systems
So if the tool doesn't do what it's supposed to be doing we should blame the user instead of the company that made the tool?
> Retain full human responsibility and accountability for any consequences arising from the use of AI systems
So if the tool doesn't do what it's supposed to be doing we should blame the user instead of the company that made the tool?
You are quoting a point from my summary and extrapolating what my post might be saying.
Even in that quote, I do not say that the user must be responsible. The point is that responsibility and accountability should remain with some humans. Depending on the case, those humans may be the people who manufactured the tool, the people who deployed it or the people who took bad output from the tool and applied it to the real world.
Did you read the actual section at <https://susam.net/inverse-laws-of-robotics.html#non-abdicati...>? It has more nuance than what the summary alone can capture.