alt Hacker NewsRoyalties for inference are unrealistic in a way that even royalties for training aren't.
The LLaMA models were released openly. Copies exist everywhere in the world. You aren't going to be able to charge someone for running `llama.cpp`; a court order ceases to have practical relevance at that point.
Replies
swader999 • yesterday at 9:28 PM
These models can provide citations so I don't see why they can't tick a royalty owed. I'm sure many here could help build this pipeline.
➕ show 2 replies
Inference might be unreasonable for a royalty agreement, but, in assessing damages, it is certainly relevant.
"I made enough copies for everyone" isn't a valid defense for copyright infringement.