You argue against "individualist societies" but then blame "their parents" for not coping with the kinda impossible task of protecting their kids from big tech or the surveillance state.
It is a collective problem with collective solutions.
So your solution to preventing "surveillance state" is to unmask everyone on the internet? Now who has the inconsistent argument
I did not say anything about protecting kids from big tech or the state?
Even if I had, your argument is we must surveil more to protect the kids from the surveillance state?