Stealing every intellectual property on the planet to build a plagiarism machine that is wrong 10% of the time, could be interpreted as a scam by many folks.
That sentence could easily be applied to the human baseline.
What exactly is your complaint about Anna's Archive?
[dead]
> wrong 10% of the time
that doesn't sound nearly as bad as you think it does; I don't see how ethics are relevant here either, unless oil is also somehow a scam
regardless, one must be delusional to deny the fact that it's useful tech
"but they're evil" is not an argument
Is there anyway to build intelligence that doesn't meet the definition of plagiarism you are using here?
I remember when IP laws were looked at like a form of oppression in the tech community...