logoalt Hacker News

Arodextoday at 12:00 PM5 repliesview on HN

>Corporate leaders are starting to question whether soaring AI spending is delivering meaningful returns.

We should start to question whether soaring CEO salary spending is delivering meaningful results.


Replies

utopiahtoday at 12:28 PM

Ah, that's not how it works : CEOs are rich so they are successful. They are successful so they are rich. Q.E.D.

show 2 replies
Tangurena2today at 1:42 PM

About 2 decades ago, there were multiple studies showing that C-level execs who offshored work/production got 18% higher compensation. I'm sure that the same bizjournals are claiming that C-level execs that "embrace" AI are getting similar compensation premiums over anyone who takes a "wait and see" approach. The quantity of AI appearing in bizjournals reminds me of Paul Graham's essay on The Submarine.

https://www.paulgraham.com/submarine.html

hnthrow0287345today at 1:36 PM

All we can really do is point and laugh. Boards don't listen to workers, and I bet most boards will be okay with a little spending oopsie-daisy because it was 'try shit and see if it works out'

gchamonlivetoday at 12:31 PM

We are since at least the 2000s when the world wide web revolution finally made it possible for Google, Apple, Amazon etc... to become the behemoths they are. And maybe even before that.

And the answer is no, because when chief officers succeed it's because of their genius and forward thinking posture, but when they fail it's none of their fault, so they are shielded in an echo chamber that produces such delusions and psychosis.

show 1 reply
testaccount28today at 1:47 PM

what a bizarre non sequitur