logoalt Hacker News

schnitzelstoattoday at 2:42 PM5 repliesview on HN

Yeah, many companies don't want the liability issues. Like what happens if I open my bank account on my work computer? You could argue I can expect someone to be watching but I have no warning that someone is? Here in the EU that would probably be an easy lawsuit.


Replies

patmcctoday at 4:20 PM

Why would you ever login to a sensitive account on a device you don't own and have root on? Like I trust my employer not to do anything shifty with my banking info, if I were to use it, but I'm not going to take that chance for a dozen reasons.

show 3 replies
wpsimon3today at 2:49 PM

Can’t speak for the EU, but the companies I’ve worked for in the US explicitly state what they do not track in their privacy/use policy when giving out laptops/phones/tablets.

E.g. their anti-virus or firewall system may ignore URLs related to banking, medical, or political affiliation and chose not to log or decrypt that traffic

show 1 reply
FinanceFreddytoday at 5:06 PM

A lot is tolerated, until they want to get rid of you. But in the EU i'm pretty sure they can't use regular non-compliance stuff (general browsing, etc) in evidence. In DE you can't even identify an individual.

jopsentoday at 3:58 PM

Moreover: what is the upside?

Spying on employees is not free. If you want to spend serious resources doing it, there has to be an upside.

jbuhbjlnjbntoday at 2:53 PM

How do you expect an employee to prove their banking actions on the company computer were spied on? I imagine this impossible to prove.

show 3 replies