logoalt Hacker News

gammalosttoday at 4:44 PM3 repliesview on HN

At the risk of sounding a bit pretentious: I think the relationship a lot of people have with books can best be described as commodity fetisishm.

People see some value in the physical books themselves. They are sacred, discarding them becomes a crime against knowledge. Sure I get it, the nazis burned books; but these libraries are in no way comparable to that


Replies

ciscoriordantoday at 4:49 PM

I stayed at an Airbnb that had fake books on the shelves! I looked them up and they aren't even especially cheap. But they probably get stolen a lot less.

show 3 replies
the_aftoday at 4:55 PM

I don't know whether to call it fetishism, which has a negative undertone to me.

But I do love physical books. Even unimposing books, I like reading them but also touching them, their smell, their covers. And for art books, I think it goes without saying that the experience of the digital version is markedly different to the physical version.

I love going to a used books store and simply perusing their shelves, occasionally buying something, and a digital library simply cannot replicate this.

NoMoreNicksLefttoday at 6:03 PM

For how many thousands of years were books equivalent to absurd wealth. Kings might own a book, or several. Libraries were amazing, but places never seen by the proles and serfs. Thousands of years is a duration more than long enough to give our species some instinctual reverence for the object, reverence that is only reinforced by what we learn from an early age about those. And it's not just the wealth, at least for some sizable fraction of the population, we come to know books as things of knowledge and power, so slurring them as mere commodities is low-handed.

Books are, I think, in some small way, sacred. And I don't want to associate with people who think otherwise. I don't think you get it at all.