logoalt Hacker News

Show HN: Are You in the Weights?

114 pointsby turtlesouptoday at 8:49 PM84 commentsview on HN

With more traffic moving off-web and into LLMs, I got curious about what traces we leave "in the weights". My design partner and I built a site in the past few weeks that checks recognition across frontier and small models. It queries many of them in parallel, clusters the responses, and tells you how strongly they recognize you. Happy to answer any questions here!


Comments

aposmtoday at 11:12 PM

I only got hallucinations of random combinations of my (fairly unique) last name & first names that do not exist, combined with very accomplished and completely fictional biographies. I guess I'm not notable enough which is somewhat comforting.

foxfiredtoday at 10:04 PM

6 Football (soccer) players share my name and I still am at the top. Type "SEO" and I'll DM you my one little weird trick. /jk

Fun story about my name [0], the bank couldn't mail me my debit card because the mailman kept crossing my address off the envelop.

[0]: https://idiallo.com/blog/sharing-a-name

embedding-shapetoday at 10:54 PM

What exactly is the "N strength · Top N%" referring to? My name is most likely 100% unique in the world, seems I'm in about 50% of the weights, but I'm really not sure I understand what those yellow numbers mean.

A completely made up name got "110 strength · Top 60%" and "hits" in GPT-5.5 and "Gemini 3.1 Lite", not sure what to make of that either.

show 1 reply
hyperpapetoday at 9:27 PM

I’m a hallucination. None of these are me.

Perhaps the closest is DeepSeek v4:

> Hyperpape is a user on the LessWrong forum, known for thoughtful comments on rationality and philosophy.

I studied philosophy, so maybe, except I don't post on LessWrong, and I'm not a rationalist.

https://www.intheweights.com/p/hyperpape

show 1 reply
comrade1234today at 10:47 PM

Apparently I'm an American volcanologist. Pretty cool.

(I nuke my online accounts regularly to not be tracked - started because I had a stalker but now it's just for the best. I know that this goes against hn rules but yeah it's a bad rule)

Alive-in-2025today at 9:41 PM

This is a clever trick to get you to enter your real name. ;-) I entered mine, I was on the page kind of, there was some kind of exaggeration of me as the last one. I was surprised someone else in my family who is a kind of actual famous person was not found. It seems to have a lot of recency bias based on that.

JohnMakintoday at 10:57 PM

For something that's a toy project, and definitely doesn't seem it's a transparent attempt to get HN user's names, there sure are a lot of tracking cookies for such a website.

show 1 reply
florentoday at 9:41 PM

Well, guess we'll have to wait a bit to see if we're in the weights... I got a 429, as I'm sure many others are (and thus mashing retry).

show 1 reply
zingartoday at 9:26 PM

Bahaha apparently only in their hallucinations. I’m not a professional rugby player or a neurologist.

show 4 replies
Jaxkrtoday at 9:54 PM

This must be a remarkably expensive demo/toy to operate.

show 1 reply
nickcwtoday at 10:14 PM

Ha ha! Yes I am in the weights apparently. Nearly all the models know what I do.

I suspect being in the Open Source world is a bit of a bubble as far as the weights are concerned.

Anyway it stroked my ego nicely even though it was totally artificial, like Zaphod Beeblebrox surviving the Total Perspective Vortex.

tiagobrawtoday at 9:38 PM

Interesting. Claude Opus 4.8 and Gemini 3.1 Lite kind of got it right, but when I ask the model directly, they say they don't know. I'm curious how the tool is doing the correlation.

show 1 reply
pgttoday at 9:55 PM

Only a fool would enter their name in this.

show 2 replies
radkutoday at 10:52 PM

No privacy policy whatsoever?

presidentendertoday at 9:40 PM

Strangely only "Kimi" has accurately heard of me. Gemini thinks I'm a German-language version of the stuff I do in English, Kimi recognizes my long-defunct blogging about technology and economics.

AgentMEtoday at 10:03 PM

Of these models, only Kimi had anything on me and it was pretty inaccurate.

When Fable was accessible, I asked it about myself and it had some accurate information about me. It's neat. It feels a tiny bit like I got to sign the Voyager probe. I wonder if Fable was trained on a significantly different selection of data or if it's just better at retaining rare details it saw in its training.

kylecazartoday at 10:00 PM

Apparently I share a name with a prominent white nationalist activist. Yikes.

kjuulhtoday at 9:44 PM

Interesting Mistral sort of knew something about me, both gpt and deepseek produced the same answer more or less. I wonder why xD, only gemini knew my online handle mostly github and rust which is interesting.

pryelluwtoday at 9:22 PM

Well, according to this I’m a Mexican painter/actor/footballer. Love it.

hereme888today at 10:16 PM

I really like the website itself

Brajeshwartoday at 9:55 PM

Deepseek seems to know a lot about me!

If I have a strength of just 488, how can that put me in the top 10%! Anyways, fun idea.

reactordevtoday at 9:43 PM

They all know me to 68%-88% certainty. “Known for my contributions to open source”, yeah, sure, let’s go with that ;)

_fzslmtoday at 9:42 PM

Love the graphics, the 8-bit style of the people's portraits is really well done. Are those AI generated?

show 1 reply
kylemaxwelltoday at 10:01 PM

Surprised to find myself in the top 50%. Like... _really_ surprised.

dmixtoday at 9:40 PM

First response for me was also a hallucinated Scottish soccer player who doesn't exist

ooloncoloophidtoday at 9:34 PM

I’m the top one! Interesting to see the hallucinations creeping in across the weaker models.

monknomotoday at 9:38 PM

well, the lower confidence ones got my pseudonym, the higher confidence ones missed entirely and attributed it to a prominent speedrunning streamer.

My real name was attributed to a non-existent famous midfield footballer

rolfvandekroltoday at 9:38 PM

There is a 'hallucinations' section on the page, which suggests that the items above that section are not hallucinated. I highly doubt that.

I am, as far a I know the only person in the world with my name. So I searched for my name. I am none of many things this tool tells me I am, for example a right wing politician, a journalist,l and a researcher on solar fuels.

show 1 reply
athrowtoday at 9:41 PM

Apparently gpt 5.5 thinks I’m a metal folk musician, i wish.

show 1 reply
lackoftacticstoday at 9:43 PM

Nice, I am not good enough engineer to be in the weights

kevin42today at 9:40 PM

Can you share the prompt you're using for each model?

show 1 reply
mikeryantoday at 9:34 PM

MICHAEL RYAN HUNGERFORD MASSACRE PERPETRATOR 204 STRENGTH · TOP 35%

For fucks sake.

show 3 replies
cmrdporcupinetoday at 10:30 PM

It's amazing how it jumbles things up. Really shows you that even the leading models still very much hallucinate esp when they don't have the ability to go looking for more context. It took various things related to stuff I work on but mixed them up and added pure invention or mixed bits up with other people with vaguely similar names or projects.

hnarayanantoday at 10:11 PM

I love this!

VarunMenontoday at 9:49 PM

super cool!! I love the idea and the UI

6stringmerctoday at 9:53 PM

Fascinating! I’d like to learn more about how to interpret the results to be honest, the About is awesome and helpful.

I scored 1,100 total on my music moniker. It has been used in SoundCloud and also via streaming services/releases via DistroKid. Represented in all the models but of course not disproportionally large fame so to speak. It’s just a very unique setup, somewhat designed to stand out.

My writing account, newer within the past few years, is just under 1,000. The Kimi and DeepSeek pick that up a lot more. I wonder if they train on Medium more than the others…

Thanks for sharing!

sltkrtoday at 9:53 PM

It nailed 2 out of 4, which I'm not going to repeat to preserve a modicum of privacy.

But unfortunately I'm not a professional footballer _or_ a fictional character in a Henry James novel (though I looked up the reference and it's close!)

techpressiontoday at 9:52 PM

Feels great to have both a very generic first and last name and share them with others who are internationally known and some more locally. I really have no desire to be in model weights.

irishcoffeetoday at 9:43 PM

An they nailed me, as soon as I clicked the link I saw “rate exceeded”

NoMoreNicksLefttoday at 9:38 PM

My username shows up as me. My real name is apparently shared by more real people than I figured (surname is an oddball). That guy's a CEO and billionaire. Go figure, never heard of him until just now.

jubilantitoday at 9:54 PM

PRIVACY WARNING: Every name/text entered into this site is publicly listed on the "latest" leaderboard which seems to paginate endlessly.

show 6 replies
dvttoday at 9:39 PM

I have a unique last name (maybe that's why), but pretty much nailed it:

    David Titarenco
    Software engineer and open-source contributor

    340 strength · Top 20%

    GPT-5.5 says
    Software engineer and writer known for work
    on developer tools, systems, and programming-
    related articles.

    Claude Opus 4.8 says
    Software engineer and entrepreneur known for
    web/JavaScript development work and contributions
    to open-source projects and tech startup communities.
georgemcbaytoday at 9:36 PM

"George McBay"

> Llama 3.2 1B says

> American actor, best known for his roles in films such as 'The Big Lebowski' and 'The Big Lebowski 2'.

Nailed it! /s

But even the entries that aren't marked as likely hallucinations are wrong for me on this site.

> George McBay

> African American chemist and educator

No, that's Henry Cecil McBay (no direct relation that I'm aware of).

Google Search's AI mode does match actual me, but the information it spits out is all mixed up with information on another person who has my same name (also no relation that I'm aware of) and is also a software developer.

show 1 reply
pixelneontoday at 9:34 PM

It looks like something perfect, what is its purpose?

show 1 reply