> just because it's approximated by a bell curve doesn't make it a bell curve
I'm going to assume this is bait...
Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape.
You can't call it a bell curve unless it's from the Charles Murray region. It's just sparkling statistics.
Bell curves are probability distributions. This is a time series, so it can’t be a bell curve. It just has the same shape.