logoalt Hacker News

timperatoday at 1:49 PM3 repliesview on HN

I recently tried Pangram, created an account, wrote a few lines about how my day went, and it was flagged as likely AI-assisted. It clearly doesn't work.

It's especially bad that they keep insisting that it works very well, because thousands of people will probably end up falsely accused of AI usage as a result.


Replies

skippyfishtoday at 2:07 PM

Can you share your experiment, so that we can draw our own conclusions? I've been paying for Pangram for a long time and have not seen it misbehave even once. I've seen many people attack it, but when I looked more closely, their claims often evidently boiled down to "I want plausible deniability for my own use of LLMs" - i.e., they were clearly posting AI-generated content on social media and just didn't like the possibility of being called out.

I'm not saying that's you, but since a proof is easy to produce, it would be nice if you could share.

show 4 replies
Wowfunhappytoday at 3:53 PM

The problem is likely that you only wrote a few sentences. Pangram clearly needs more text than that to work, which makes sense.

Pangram should refuse to work with small amounts of text. (Well, I know it already does, but the threshold should clearly be significantly higher.)

johnfntoday at 3:30 PM

This issue is, like, exactly what the response from Pangram is talking about.