NSA and IETF, Part 9

I enjoyed the @tptacek cameo. I suspect tptacek didn’t.

It's never been clear to me why NSA's "blue team" directorates haven't been spun off into a separate agency. Sure, NSA strengthened the S-boxes in DES and SHA-1 but from the outside there's no way to know whether they're making DES stronger against differential cryptanalysis or whether they're introducing a DUAL_EC-style vulnerability.

I'm sure there's a game-theoretic optimum choice when it comes to accepting proposals from the NSA vs rejecting them out of hand, but I'm not sure what that optimal choice is.

> I'm happy to report that 82 people spoke up on the TLS mailing list in unambiguous opposition to this spec during the voting period

How many of them spoke before on this mailing list, in any capacity what so ever? I suspect this is 99% people who showed up because you organized a brigadging, because you incited people and told them to show up and be completely outraged.

There's a >0% chance that DJB could be correct that there is some risk to this spec (which notably is not seeking recommendation status! So WTF?) The people approving and wanting this aren't fools, aren't lackies, aren't some great foe. There's little real opposition? Making up ghosts and enemies lurking in every corner, brigading people to show up in IETF meetings, who have never participated before, just to spread heat and anger you've programmed them for, is ignoble & indecent.

All too recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48760490 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48811887