logoalt Hacker News

lenerdenatortoday at 3:44 PM1 replyview on HN

To them, the consent is using the device/service/whatever.

You see it in various bits of EULA and ToS all the time. "Continued use of <insert thing here> implies agreement with the license terms".

Now, is that at all feasible when you need a smartphone to do things like pay for parking in cities or to read menus at restaurants? No. Do the people in SV who think this way also try to wedge their products and services in every single nook, cranny, and crevice of our lives as a way to increase their net worth? Yes. Is this indicative that these people have severe antisocial or sociopathic tendencies that we, as a society, need to handle? I'm not a psychologist.


Replies

john_strinlaitoday at 4:53 PM

>To them, the consent is using the device/service/whatever.

exactly. the problem is the missing qualifying word.

when consumers say consent, it's almost always referring to informed consent.

when companies say consent, it's almost always referring to implied consent.