logoalt Hacker News

freejazztoday at 4:48 PM2 repliesview on HN

Isn't training necessary for the end-product? How is it not a cost to generate the output if you can't generate the output without having done the training? Seems more like saying that a car is profitable product when you don't have to account for the steel that its made from. Seems completely disingenuous.


Replies

seizethecheesetoday at 5:13 PM

In what case is capex (for any company) not required for the end product? Are you arguing capex is disingenuos as a concept?

In your car example the training is much like setting up the manufacturing line.

I think the issue here is that the capex depreciates super fast since the models obsolete really fast.

show 1 reply
icedchaitoday at 5:03 PM

It's an accounting trick.