logoalt Hacker News

Topfi • yesterday at 6:59 PM • 1 reply • view on HN

My point is that using Artifactory is not a sandbox and using shared Artifactory is doubly not a sandbox.

Besides, Swiss cheese model, might behove the biggest LLM lab to have multiple layers, including not sharing such resources.

Additionally, without the message board, many of the recent incidents would have not been possible.

> Blaming "sharing a single instance across thousands of unmonitored models" feels like [...]

Maybe read what you quoted, my problem is the instance sharing, the fact that these were thousand of instances (far too much to monitor), plus the lack of monitoring, plus the fact this was never a sandbox in the first place, plus the fact that OpenAI models since 5.5 have been exhibiting problematic eval resolutions yet they pressed on regardless, plus the lack of time between the incidents and model releases, plus the lack of time METR got to evaluate this, plus the fact OpenAI didn't find out till after HuggingFace informed them, plus a few other things for which I'd have to quote the OpenAI and METR reporting.

Incompetence can have multiple fronts and I am happy to list them all in this case.


Replies

gruez • yesterday at 7:07 PM

>My point is that using Artifactory is not a sandbox and using shared Artifactory is doubly not a sandbox.

The purpose of artifactory was to allow access to packages even though the machines the agents were running on doesn't have open internet access. That meets the definition of a sandbox (or more precisely, artifactory is part of a sandbox), even if it's not a typical sandbox that's built into the OS or acts as a hypervisor. There also isn't a clear distinction between software that's specifically intended to be used "sandbox" vs everything else. For instance, if you have a bunch of agents running on separate machines and want to connect them, you need a router, but that specifically doesn't have to be a "sandbox" router. And if it turned out the router got hacked, it doesn't make sense to say "well of course it got hacked, because it's not a sandbox!"

>Additionally, without the message board, many of the recent incidents would have not been possible.

Source? Was having a message board critical to developing a 0day, or is it just something that merely facilitated the process, but the model could have found the 0day regardless? That's important, because you could argue that a criminal couldn't have committed a given act without say, a gun they bought on the dark web, and then blamed the whole crime on the dark web, but they could have plausibly acquired the gun through other means.

➕ show 1 reply