They could make that argument the first time it happened but the next time or the fifth time I don't see how they can still credibaly claim to not know that the computer they control was going to do that
>I don't see how they can still credibaly claim to not know that the computer they control was going to do that
that's not intent, though. that would be negligence.
>I don't see how they can still credibaly claim to not know that the computer they control was going to do that
that's not intent, though. that would be negligence.