What have they been wrong about? What is wrong in the article?
I believe the objection is because they are constantly negative, even before LLMs were a fraction of its usefulness today.
Every technology has its negative parts, but breathlessly pointing out the negatives gets really old.
I believe the objection is because they are constantly negative, even before LLMs were a fraction of its usefulness today.
Every technology has its negative parts, but breathlessly pointing out the negatives gets really old.