logoalt Hacker News

para_parolu • today at 2:30 AM • 8 replies • view on HN

Why? To increase chances of crashes that produces more views?


Replies

duskwuff • today at 2:46 AM

Traction control was allowed before 2008. The problem was that it trivialized some aspects of driving - drivers could floor the throttle through turns at little to no risk. (I suspect there may have also been some concerns that drivers who pushed traction control too far could have easily ended up in unrecoverable situations.)

There's some interesting discussion of the history and technical aspects at: https://www.f1-forecast.com/pdf/F1-Files/Honda/F1-SP2_25e.pd...

nucleardog • today at 5:26 AM

> Why? To increase chances of crashes that produces more views?

Why not allow traction control? To increase crashes?

Why not allow "lane keep assist"? To increase drivers crashing into walls?

Why not allow "automatic braking"? To increase drivers slamming into walls and other drivers?

Why do we still have the human in the car when a brick on the accelerator could do the same job? So when the cars crash people feel there are real stakes?

(Presumably they've decided they want the sport to be about the drivers to some extent.)

➕ show 1 reply
stingraycharles • today at 2:43 AM

Basically, there's an endless struggle between "how much do we let automation control?" If there were no such rules, the role of the driver would be far less than it is now, which would effectively reduce competition.

➕ show 1 reply
usefulcat • today at 3:50 AM

Crashes don't directly make for a better race; what matters is the amount of actual competition, and for that you need variation.

If every driver drove exactly the same way, then the race would be 100% down to basically just team strategy and the car itself. For fans of strategy that might be fine, but I think most people would find it much less interesting.

johannes1234321 • today at 2:40 AM

I am not big in F1, but my understanding is that the primary goal is to have the driver be more relevant over the car/firmware producers.

➕ show 2 replies
pertymcpert • today at 3:10 AM

Traction control removes of the most fundamental skills of a driver. It’s like allowing ABS.

➕ show 1 reply
stackghost • today at 2:41 AM

The entire purpose of traction control is to reduce the driver skill required when cornering and braking. This is why traction control is omnipresent in consumer vehicles, because the vast majority of road drivers are awful.

FIA bans traction control so as to place more emphasis on driver skill.

vel0city • today at 2:52 AM

We should allow batting machines for baseball players to hit the ball more reliably as well. Poker players should play with their cards face up. I agree.

Manually controlling to the limits of the car is a big part of the skill of racing.