logoalt Hacker News

StrLght • today at 5:06 PM • 4 replies • view on HN

This sounds like a huge feature though? Basically, a digital attorney–client privilege.


Replies

rckoepke • today at 5:23 PM

There's no digital attorney-client privilege. If a lawyer uses LLM's on your behalf, the communications are protected. If you use the same LLM's on your own behalf, the chats are not protected.

DOJ could cut Z.ai off from US-based payment systems (Mastercard/Visa) if they don't comply with subpoenas.

➕ show 2 replies
woodruffw • today at 5:19 PM

A key point of attorney-client privilege is that it's a feature of the legal system itself, not a technical or political hack.

post-it • today at 5:15 PM

More like attorney-client liability

➕ show 1 reply
villish • today at 5:13 PM

You should not trust any LLM to give you accurate legal advice. I can’t imagine all the ways that could go wrong.

➕ show 1 reply