>This is just because agents don’t see ads right?
Put another way, because it undermines the revenue that is providing you the service. Working around it is not a sustainable solution.
Indeed. One could reasonably argue that viewing ads on Amazon plausibly lowers the cost of goods served, just as connected TV targeted advertising allows very low cost TVs. I think that’s quite believable. Given that, I’m a free rider, somewhat like a software or media pirate.
Not outlandish. The prices are a big motivator and I wonder how much they’d have to charge me to compensate. My agent probably sees the sponsored results before it sees the other results but that is probably considered insufficient compensation.
I think I’ll keep doing what I’m doing but primarily because if the world is forced to charge higher prices to compensate for the lack of advertising I think that isn’t an outcome I particularly am upset by. It passes a Categorical Imperative Test, if you will.
I've never updated on this: The web was better when there were little or no ad-revenue based services. (and I'm ok with actually paying for services that add value)
I will always block ads no matter what. I don't care about what is sustained, there will be some way to get these things, and if not, we will get used to that too. Meanwhile I will not tolerate ads.