logoalt Hacker News

paxy • today at 12:43 PM • 6 replies • view on HN

Why do they keep stressing the "games you already bought!!!" part? There is no charge to play the game on your own hardware. This pricing is for renting the GPUs, same as GeForce Now and plenty of other services. And it's a pretty solid deal for people who don't want to build a multi-thousand dollar rig for gaming 10-20 hours a week.


Replies

InsidiousWombat • today at 9:16 PM

> There is no charge to play the game on your own hardware.

well, unless you want to play some peer to peer multiplayer, then there is a sub you need to pay

swiftcoder • today at 1:29 PM

Because the model is diverged from the existing model Microsoft established via Game Pass, which made game streaming part of the licensing, not an add-on to purchasing.

Feels bad to buy an expensive piece of hardware, a $60+ game, and then be asked to pony up another hourly fee to play it on your tablet.

Of course, free game streaming was never a viable business model, so this isn't unexpected, but people aren't going to love the change either way.

➕ show 4 replies
squidlib • today at 9:41 PM

10-20 hours a week is a lot of gaming. Was it suggested that was a small amount and not worth the investment to have an actual machine? 10-20hrs over a month is more in the realm of streaming imo.

phyzix5761 • today at 12:50 PM

> Why do they keep stressing the "games you already bought!!!" part?

Because they're trying to push a specific narrative.

4thguy • today at 1:17 PM

> Why do they keep stressing the "games you already bought!!!" part? There is no charge to play the game on your own hardware.

Correct, that is why the "to stream games you bought" qualifier exists in the title :)

matheusmoreira • today at 12:48 PM

> There is no charge to play the game on your own hardware.

They want to eliminate that. AIs will open source their games otherwise.

➕ show 5 replies