logoalt Hacker News

Aurornis • yesterday at 3:19 PM • 5 replies • view on HN

Using AI to fake posting activity is bad.

Using real member accounts to post the fake AI content is so much worse.

I can’t even imagine the thought process that led to thinking it was a good idea to generate fake posts but assign them to real users. If they were going to fake posts, why not fake the users, too? They turned one bad decision into a much worse decision.

It must be sad to see your proud little corner of the internet decline in popularity, but this move took whatever positive historical vibes it had and lit them on fire.


Replies

12_throw_away • yesterday at 6:34 PM

> Using real member accounts to post the fake AI content is so much worse.

Yeah, that part seems not just ethically bankrupt, but also really really stupid and counterproductive?

It all made a bit more sense to me when I learned that the guy who did all this is not, in fact, a physicist like I had originally assumed, but rather an "SEO lead at Shopify". [1]

[1] https://www.mkedmc.org/people/greg-bernhardt

➕ show 1 reply
embedding-shape • yesterday at 3:35 PM

> the thought process that led to thinking it was a good idea

Seemingly that can be found here: physicsforums [dot] com/threads/official-response-to-allegations-of-ai-misuse-in-pf.1078532/

> During the past several months, to counter declining engagement, I experimented with generative AI, intending to add value to "thin threads", especially those with 0 replies.

> For experiment #3, I used real accounts that I considered to be decade-old spammers as best I could tell, but I can't be 100% certain. I categorically regret and reject such a shameful and unethical decision.

(that website also modifies your clipboard when you copy stuff, big fuck you to the site owner, seemingly lacking any sort of guiding compass, good riddance to them)

➕ show 1 reply
paulpauper • yesterday at 5:20 PM

Like other zombified sites, it exists to collect ad revenue from Google. It's amazing how despite 25+ years of technological change, that Google's decades-old "click ad" model is stronger than ever.

win311fwg • yesterday at 3:51 PM

"Fake posting activity" is a weak framing. It is real activity. The risk in allowing AI-generated content is that users will be able to sniff out low-quality content produced by AI that they don't find engaging, but if they don't like it they can always leave. If users love it then AI-generated content is not bad at all.

➕ show 5 replies