logoalt Hacker News

SoftTalker • yesterday at 4:21 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

No, this has never been the case. Companies are and always have been very conscious of wage and salary expenses, as it's one of the most controllable categories on the P&L.


Replies

pseudosavant • yesterday at 5:22 PM

They are making $600k in net income per employee. 10+ years ago, I'd never seen a mass layoff at any company making that kind of money per employee.

Their net income is up more than 2x in just the last 5 years. 10 years ago, Microsoft only had $85B in revenue, now they are up to $134B in net income, and they need to let 25% of the company leave?

➕ show 6 replies
xphos • yesterday at 4:55 PM

But like if your company is making money hand over foot you didn't typically cut staff by 25%. You could just as easily do a hiring freeze and get out ahead of it. I mean if your profit metric is showing all green and growing you have to be really cold to say we need to fire 1/4 people now why? (to maximize shareholders short term value of course)

➕ show 2 replies
nunez • yesterday at 9:58 PM

And one of, if not the most, expensive costs