I see people spending so much time creating "workflow" skills that have no benchmark whatsoever to prove they are any more effective than plain one sentence prompts.

Gotta justify that $160k/yr salary somehow I guess, and if the AI is writing all the code you used to write and your job is now to manage the AI, what better way to spend the days than making new AI tools and workflows and markdown files all day

That's the whole point with AI. It's consumerism applied to software... And it sucks

why do we even care, this is a clear, lets move away from `people pushing software to git` to `agent is pushing software, agentic or not , to somehwere, db, git, or something else` human does involved in this unless there is a problem. JS or Python, is really not essential in this case, maybe it's WASM built from rust. it's not for human.

Cursor moving this direction, is a prep work where human no longer command that much , hence the usage will drop. e.g. their core product is vulnerable. Software factories, is the ultimate game over for our industry.

I attribute this to "it's so new and we don't know what the right answer is yet", but you may very well be right

> endless technologies with little to no adaption.

I think the difference is that those endless technologies will probably be used by other agents without people's explicit knowledge.

I don't think I'll ever understand this argument. Especially from purported "hackers."

Why is a large number of ideas, technologies, frameworks, etc. bad?