logoalt Hacker News

itake • today at 2:38 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

I don’t understand where this energy that signal doesn’t want 3rd party clients is coming from.

Their open source code is permissive of commercial forks.

Like, if their goal was to block third-party clients, then they would look more like Facebook or Reddit


Replies

DownrightNifty • today at 4:00 PM

Under Signal's original leadership, there was definitely a hard stance against third party clients connecting to the network. I think they've been quiet on third party clients since Moxie left.

➕ show 1 reply
palata • today at 3:25 PM

You can totally fork their projects! You just can't call yours "Signal" (trademark I guess?) and you can't connect to their servers. Molly seems to be tolerated, somehow? Maybe because it is niche.

But clearly connecting to the Signal servers with an outdated, modified fork is against Signal's goal.

jraph • today at 3:01 PM

Software license ≠ terms of service.

They can give you the right to reuse their source code for building your own service using your own network (an aspire to give you this right), but still forbid you to connect to their service on their network with third party clients.

In practice, they don't seem to enforce that a lot (anymore).

➕ show 1 reply