logoalt Hacker News

georgeburdell • yesterday at 7:15 PM • 3 replies • view on HN

Not to offend, but I think it has declined because this naming of Jr, III, and so on has come to be associated with poor or rural people. For what it’s worth, I have a relative who is a IV


Replies

cogogo • yesterday at 7:28 PM

Never heard that framing before. In New England the practice is associated with blue-blood wealth.

➕ show 2 replies
thaumasiotes • yesterday at 9:05 PM

"Junior" might be associated with poor or rural people, but "III" and "IV" can only convey the absolute maximum level of pompousness.

(There was a brief period where my sister was dating someone who went by J.T. The initials were something of an effort to obscure his name, James III.)