Technical details aside, this volume is ridiculous. How on earth do they see this kind of "growth" as an asset and not a liability?
> Technical details aside, this volume is ridiculous. How on earth do they see this kind of "growth" as an asset and not a liability?
That coding volume is a liability only for human engineers, with their limited memory, short attention span, tiredness, and quirky coding preferences. LLMs don't have any of those problems.
This is obviously just a response to https://www.anthropic.com/research/redesigning-source-contro.... Probably no one in the chain of writing this even thought about your question.