logoalt Hacker News

Serving GLM-5.3 at 607.8 tok/s across two Nvidia DGX stations with vLLM

104 points • by wondersky • today at 2:09 PM • 55 comments • view on HN

Comments

hkalbasi • today at 2:51 PM

Assuming the DGX priced at $100K, and GLM-5.3 at $1.4/M output token, this has ROI of ~7 years at maximum utilization (unlikely) and ignoring operational expenses like electricity. Which makes it economically unreasonable unless you want privacy or something like that.

➕ show 11 replies
jbellis • today at 2:46 PM

This doesn't seem all that impressive for $200k of hardware? You could serve 4bit off 8xB6000 for ~half the price. No idea what throughput you'd get tho so maybe that's the flex.

Edit: This guy already did it, and you get 60% more throughput on the 8xB6000 https://github.com/kacper-daftcode/GLM5.3-8xPRO6K

➕ show 1 reply
k0morebi • today at 5:04 PM

Is my intuition correct in that the headline tok/s are for a single user?

Multiple concurrent users make that tok/s/user at best with probably additional staking penalties with each user? I see people saying this isn't necessary for sub 100 employee businesses, but how does that work out if you have 100 users?

➕ show 2 replies
arjie • today at 3:16 PM

Curious about the >2 case. You get a Quantum X800 switch? Or just a fast Ethernet switch? These are quite cool because of the amount of VRAM on them (though I find the “unified RAM” marketing unnecessarily confusing) but I avoided them because I wasn’t sure I could network them. A B300 node is $500k but I think I’d do MI355X now at that size because new Claudes will be able to port easily.

The advantage of the station is gradual improvement. Though tbh I wonder if I should just settle for putting a few more normal H100 NVL and trying RoCE. Post is at least inspiring of ideas if nothing else.

➕ show 1 reply
boodleboodle • today at 2:34 PM

Whats the best model i should be runnning with two dgxs? Is there a reason they chose glm and not deepseek

➕ show 2 replies
flowerthoughts • today at 2:45 PM

GB300 DGX. Each with 256 GiB of RAM and a price of $100k?

For an enterprise, that price seems doable. But if you want 50-100 tps like Claude does, and you only have 10 users, maybe you're not an enterprise.

To pull a recent analogy, I guess we're still at the early Model S stage of LLMs.

AnotherGoodName • today at 3:46 PM

For anyone actually considering this $200k+ setup for home or even small business use the power usage and noise is extreme. 1.6kw each with the fans to match. 600tokens/s at concurrency 16 is not what you need for home use or even sub 100 employee business use either. Really reconsider please (do you seriously need people to tell you this?). I get tech wages are high and you can probably afford this but seriously.

Right now there’s no great solution to the frontier or near frontier models for home use. But there are cards and options coming in 2027. For now just accept that you run qwen 37b or similar.

What’s coming in 2027 that changes this and why i implore you to wait? Well for these models you need massive amounts of memory and memory bandwidth. The solution above gets this by using expensive HBM spread over enough cards with enough compute to give a ridiculous tok/s. For home use you’d actually be happier with a single GPU that had lots of cheap memory to hold the weights and just enough memory bandwidth to feed that single gpu and no more. This in theory gets you close to 50tok/s on GLM 5.3 if it existed.

In 2027 there’s expected to be multiple HBF (high bandwidth flash) options incoming. High bandwidth flash has ~10x the latency of HBM but that actually doesn’t matter much for inference. Inference is latency tolerant and local inference time to first token beats over the internet time to first token no matter what you do in any case. The bandwidth and amount of memory is the blocker.

In 2027 there’s expected to be many multi terabyte HBF options coming. NAND/NOR flash is massively cheaper than RAM per byte (multiple states per logical unit so it’s denser) and it’s not that hard to wire it in a more parallel way to increase its bandwidth. Nvidia has the Kioxia solutions and Sandisk, Samsung, Tenstorrent, Mythic have also previewed HBF with GPUs to do local inference on the open source frontier models at reasonably high tok/s. Even if HBF is sold for 10x the price per terabyte of todays flash that’s still an extremely small fraction of the price of any other option right now.

Make do with the subscriptions for now. Don’t go crazy trying to run the frontier at home today. We should have something much better solutions are coming.

➕ show 1 reply
spwa4 • today at 4:21 PM

Hopefully ERNIE 5.5 (open weight) is about the performance of GLM-5.3 (looks that way from preliminary evals) and it should run easily on one DGX station.

Maybe even a Q4 quant on 128G, like an M5 max laptop or a DGX spark ...

walrus01 • today at 2:40 PM

I'll get right on that after an elderly relative passes away and leaves me a valuable piece of real estate in a major city that will sell for enough money to buy two DGX stations in the current market. Or I win the lottery.

➕ show 1 reply
gabucino • today at 3:06 PM

[flagged]