> Fable 5.2 may behave well because it mistakenly assumes it is being tested for safety. As models become smarter, they may learn that most interactions are not safety tests. If that mistaken assumption is what keeps Fable 5.2 behaving well, future versions may not behave as safely.
It’s cryptic lesswrongese. I hate the writing style so much.
That sentence is very straightforward. How would you rewrite it?