logoalt Hacker News

TikTok Deal Is the Shittiest Possible Outcome, Making Everything Worse

264 pointsby lateforworktoday at 4:14 PM250 commentsview on HN

Comments

lateforworktoday at 5:25 PM

China is outsmarting the current administration in every way, see here:

"From Chips to Security, China Is Getting Much of What It Wants From the U.S." https://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/12/world/asia/nvidia-china-t...

show 5 replies
biophysboytoday at 5:13 PM

I think one of my biggest frustrations with tech right now is how credulous they are with regard to China vs USA arguments. I see it on HN regularly.

I am not saying the China shock was fake, or state surveillance is fine, or that they don’t exploit migrant workers, or that their currency manipulation and financial repression were/are good. I just think we should be skeptical that national security arguments are motivated by virtue, especially when “the good” is largely confined to what’s good for USA tech

show 7 replies
cons0letoday at 4:43 PM

They can do whatever they want with it with the sure knowledge that the users will never leave it. Tiktok is the digital equivalent of "getting kids addicted to heroin"

show 5 replies
_menelaustoday at 6:22 PM

Does anyone actually not realize this was to stymie criticism of Israel? You Netanyahu bragging about how this is central to winning the propaganda war. Ellison is the biggest private donor to the IDF. Put it together.

show 3 replies
Gormanutoday at 5:08 PM

The deal itself feels messy and political, not like a serious solution to data or security concerns. In the end, the risks are still there, and it’s hard to see what regular users actually win from this.

show 3 replies
NoGravitastoday at 7:13 PM

One thing I've been trying to find since the deal was announced, and this article doesn't help either, is when this actually takes effect, i.e., when does Larry the Lawnmower get access to everyone's TikTok's comments?

rcontitoday at 6:44 PM

They keep mentioning "innovation". What's innovative about shoveling mindless junk in people's faces 24x7? We've got a lot of these platforms already. Do we need an even MORE mindless one to dethrone TikTok? Is that a win for literally anyone other than investors?

show 1 reply
jadartoday at 6:35 PM

This tells me nothing except the author’s politics.

dparktoday at 7:40 PM

So ByteDance maintains majority control. A huge win for the American people as always.

apawloskitoday at 5:19 PM

I am still baffled, because wasn't there a bipartisan law passed banning TikTok? Is that just being ignored while a deal is orchestrated to sell it to Larry Ellison (and install Barron Trump on the TikTok Board of Directors)? The enforcement of the law is confusing to me here.

show 5 replies
shevy-javatoday at 5:40 PM

The TikTok deal seems to be more about empowering US corporations than anything else. It seems as if they hate all forms of competition under the orange man ruling the USA right now, so of course TikTok must be crushed (not that I use any of those antisocial media, it is just an observation made).

We see something similar in Europe in that Musk burps out the EU must disband after they fined his company for breaking local laws. It's like a really stupid variant of corporatocracy dominating the USA right now; at the least in the past it was a bit more subtle. Now it is like barbarian posing as oligarchs are having crazy fits. I think 99.9% of their wealth must be confiscated and given to The People - too much wealth makes the mind weak and leads them to act as tyrannical parasites.

show 1 reply
ojbyrnetoday at 6:07 PM

“Shittiest Possible Outcome” is basically the motto of the current administration.

lenerdenatortoday at 5:41 PM

Is there some provision that enabled the executive branch to keep extending the purchase deadline?

If not, the sale is illegal. Congress passed a law saying that TikTok was to be banned. Not "can be sold after a bunch of backroom deals by tech aristocracy that happens to be friends with an incredibly corrupt President", but banned. SCOTUS agreed that the law held up to scrutiny.

show 2 replies
jacknewstoday at 4:54 PM

lol, so 'We know this is crack cocaine mind-control spyware. Give us a seat in the control room'

diogenescynictoday at 5:59 PM

Ah but it’s the best outcome for Israel so they can now suppress videos from Gaza.

standardUsertoday at 5:50 PM

> if these folks were all so concerned about U.S. consumer privacy, they should have passed a functional modern internet privacy law applying to all U.S. companies and their executives.

This is the way. I wonder if we'll ever see the day that consumers get a fighting chance.

mcs5280today at 6:57 PM

Welcome to the Ellisonverse

Braxton1980today at 5:23 PM

Now Republicans directly control X and Tiktok. I place the blame on their supporters, especially those who are engineers and others who are on Hackernews. The most frustrating aspect is they won't face any justice for their support.

yieldcrvtoday at 5:22 PM

Now it won't be Beijing having coercive access to your data

It'll be Larry Ellison, a slaver nation, and a PE surveillance focused firm having consensual access to your data! And the US government!

we did it guys!

show 3 replies
DudeOpotomustoday at 5:15 PM

Its a Trump deal. Everything the man touches turns to shit.

show 1 reply
SilverElfintoday at 4:31 PM

This rant has some truth in it but it goes too far and comes off as unbalanced. From the conclusion:

> This was never about addressing privacy, propaganda, or national security. It was always about the U.S. stealing ownership of one of the most popular and successful short form video apps in history because companies like Facebook were too innovatively incompetent to dethrone them in the open market. Ultimately this bipartisan accomplishment not only makes everything worse, it demonstrates we’re absolutely no better than the countries we criticize.

I think when PAFACA passed and set up a ban of TikTok, it was in fact about privacy and propaganda and national security. It’s just that the Trump administration looks at every single situation as an opportunity for grift and corruption, and they abused the opportunity.

The deal does shift algorithmic control and moderation to US based entities. I am not sure what that means in reality. Maybe they can just say they’re in control but choose to use the existing system? Who knows. The terms of the deal look like they help with the original concerns on the face of it.

show 4 replies
asadmtoday at 5:13 PM

[flagged]

show 1 reply
anthem2025today at 4:26 PM

[flagged]

show 3 replies
farceSpheruletoday at 4:48 PM

Social Media is the digital equivalent of "getting kids addicted to heroin" reply

> This was never about addressing ... national security

You have no idea what you are talking about.

Meekrotoday at 4:59 PM

The stated purpose of the law was to get TikTok out of the hands of a foreign adversary, and that was accomplished. Remember when Trump took office, and lots of people were worried he would refuse to enforce this law?

It sounds like the author would have preferred that a different group of billionaires take over.

show 3 replies